Reference mode of the day

by estiens on June 2, 2010

We know that in the past long-term unemployment has had lifetime effects on people and families. We also know that over half of all people unemployed for six months or longer in the past, when hired again, were in completely different fields.

You could say that such a dramatic rise in longterm unemployment has given the chance for new and emerging firms to have their pick of experienced talent from a wide variety of fields and that this is an opportunity for an outdated US economy to shift towards 21st Century jobs.

Effects that aren’t being talked about so much: children born in poverty over the past two years (and next XXX years) that otherwise wouldn’t have been and have lacked access to adequate nutrition, medical care, love/affection/nurturing, etc; whether we will be able to get out out of a downward spiral of [unemployment --> less money for job retraining, safety net benefits, etc ---> more unemployment] etc (we have simply never dealt with this large a mass of people unable to find jobs before); the unequal distribution of the above – especially by race and age, and what that means for how recovery might or might not happen in various communities.

Based on all the last recessions, it seems there is very little noise or oscillation at the top of the peak. Once it starts moving down, it continues. So far, there is no sign of a turnaround here, but if we do see one, I think we can say that all things being equal, it should continue. However, all other recessions have occurred pre Peak Oil, when there was plenty of easily accessible petro-energy to rev up the economy. It is unclear that that is the case this time.

It is worth at least a mention, that as we see so many of these indicators push into places that they have never been, that there is the opportunity that people will start to question the entire structure of “jobs”/”work”. A shift to a new norms of what “sufficient material wealth” looks like and why it is that some people are able to maintain their lifestyle while many others can’t is one possible/hopeful outcome here.

Share

{ 0 comments }

An article in the New York Times looks at the hallowing out of the Black middle class in Memphis and the reversal of decades worth of economic gains:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/business/economy/31memphis.html

From a purely structural standpoint, it has long looked like African-American employment disparities are both part of initial condition gap that has never closed as well as subject to more volatility than white unemployment [ie; macroeconomic shocks happen at the same point, however AA employment is affected quite a bit more and often takes longer to recover. This is consistent with the "last hired/first fired" hypothesis.

The Economic Policy Institute currently notes that as of December 2009, median white wealth dipped 34 percent, to $94,600; median black wealth dropped 77 percent, to $2,100.

Because wealth provides a safety net in times of economic hardship, what we are seeing -- even in the best case scenario of a recovery that is underway [which I think is highly unlikely], is a completely decimated Black middle class, as well as a complete drawdown of the limited amount of assets that were available.

If a higher percentage of black families are unemployed, staying unemployed for longer, and drawing on much smaller pools of wealth as a safety net, that means that Black wealth is going to continue disappearing much faster than white wealth. Add to that predatory lending practices, the greater likelihood of foreclosure in segregated communities, and the greater likelihood of losing all wealth when you are starting with a much smaller amount and you have a situation where even if black and white employment and incomes were brought magically to parity tomorrow, you would see wealth disparities continue to increase.

Share

{ 0 comments }

I am looking for any models, particularly system dynamics models, that look at the phenomenon of mass incarceration in the US. I know Dennis Meadows was working on one model a while ago, but have not been able to track it down. Are you aware of any others?

Share

{ 3 comments }

Is psychiatric medication driving the growth of mental illness?

by estiens May 23, 2010

Quote of the day that lends itself to some modeling: A century ago, fewer than two people per 1,000 were considered to be “disabled” by mental illness and in need of hospitalisation . By 1955, that number had jumped to 3.38 people per 1,000, and during the past 50 years, a period when psychiatric drugs [...]

Share
Read the full article →

The Black Agenda Report on the Brandeis study

by estiens May 21, 2010

Glen Ford at the Black Agenda Report rightly points out that based on the Brandeis data, African Americans and whites will never gain wealth parity, indeed they are moving further away from it and notes that Black folks have been integrated long enough to know that the white family didn’t get richer by a quarter [...]

Share
Read the full article →